Need advice? Call us free on
0800 840 5395

Copper networks won't meet our future broadband needs

Thursday, June 28th 2012 by Paul France
Copper won't fulfil our broadband needs for much longer
The UK shouldn't continue to rely on copper cables to deliver broadband.

Opinion is divided over whether the UK's ageing copper broadband infrastructure can continue to provide the necessary levels of connectivity over the coming years.

Essentially, two schools of thought exist on the matter. Some argue that copper can live on and continue to be useful in the form of fibre-to-the-cabinet (FTTC) technology, which sees fibre optic cables run to street cabinets, before being connected to customers' homes via copper.

BT is the most important supporter of this viewpoint. The telecoms giant is aiming to reach two-thirds of the UK with its super-fast broadband network and will mostly use FTTC to help it achieve this goal.

However, this outlook has plenty of critics from people who feel that continuing to rely on copper cables is ultimately doing the UK no favours.

One company that shares this view is Kcom, which predicts that by 2016, average home broadband rates in this country will surge past 50Mbps - speeds that copper networks may struggle to cope with.

Kevin Walsh, Kcom's board director and broadband chief, told the Guardian this week that copper was only ever intended to carry voice signals, not data. "We are right at the limit of copper," he declared.

It's easy to label BT as the incumbent operator that is purely motivated by profit and has little interest in helping the UK keep pace with its European and global counterparts in terms of broadband connectivity.

That's a bit of a misleading view, and the company should actually be applauded for committing £2.5 billion to the rollout of super-fast broadband.

However, BT is deluding itself and its customers by claiming that FTTC is up to the task of meeting the UK's future broadband demands.

As bandwidth-heavy online services such as video streaming and cloud computing become increasingly commonplace, copper networks will be shown up for what they really are - outdated.

Please note that the views expressed in our blogs represent the opinions of our contributors and may not represent the opinions or views of Cable.co.uk. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in these blogs Cable.co.uk cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions herein, nor for any arising losses or damages.

Comments (3)

chris
29th June 2012
Agree totally.
Peter
29th June 2012
50Mbps can move 20GB/hour. What will this be used for? HD video only needs 10Mbps.
Takoba
24th July 2012
Any engineer working within the industry can happily tell you that copper is well capable of supporting speeds in excess of 200Mb. Since nearly all broadband suppliers have not even come close to delivering these speeds yet, copper is far from outdated as some doomsayers would predict.

Leave your comment

We will never share your email address and it will not be displayed.

Your name
Notify me of replies by email